#75: Mind your P@assw0rds

Designer (28)

Be honest: when you sign up for some website, do you just use the same email address / password? If so, you’re not alone – around three-quarters of people reuse the same passwords, even though most know they really shouldn’t.

A CyberNews study of over 19 billion exposed passwords shows that many are weak and easy to guess, too – the most popular passwords for the last 15 years are, basically, “123456” and “password”. Some of the more high-profile security breaches have come about directly because of weak and compromised credentials.

ToW has talked about passwords a bit in the distant past – #620, #656 in the old days, and most recently, #33 – Securing your Microsoft Account (MSA). If you haven’t done so already, go right now to that last link and set up Multifactor Autthentication (MFA) on your Microsoft Account.

Authenticator being Edged out

Like Google Chrome, Firefox and pretty much every modern browser, Microsoft’s Edge can offer to generate nice complex passwords for you. It also has a password store which can automatically fill your usernames & passwords next time you revisit websites, so you don’t need to remember them or write them down, and synchronise them between different devices logged in with the same ID.

A screenshot of a computer screen

AI-generated content may be incorrect.

In shock news bordering on marginal enshittification, Microsoft has decided to remove a useful component of the Authenticator app that it prefers to use for managing 2FA/MFA on its various types of logins.

Thus far, if you have Authenticator set up with your Microsoft Account or an Entra ID, you can sync your passwords from the PC and be able to review them in the app, just as you would by going to Settings / Passwords options in the desktop Edge browser (or entering edge://wallet/passwords into the address bar).

A screen shot of a phone

AI-generated content may be incorrect.

This means that it can be handy to find a username/password when you’re mobile, in case you need to enter it manually, but also it allows Authenticator to provide an “autofill service” for other apps on your device, not just web pages. When you get unceremoniously signed out of an app just because it’s been automatically updated, the autofill service can recover and re-enter your username and password.

It’s this bit that is being yanked from Authenticator – for reasons unknown, other than “Microsoft is streamlining autofill”. Maybe nobody uses it? Maybe Microsoft would prefer anyone who does use Edge on their PC and who wants to access passwords while mobile, to be compelled to use Edge on their Phone also?

Similarly, Payment info that is synced from browser to Authenticator will be removed in July 2025.

A screenshot of a phone

AI-generated content may be incorrect.

The workaround (other than moving to a completely different password management system) is indeed to switch autofill provider on your phone to use Edge instead (having first installed it and synced it with your ID, if you haven’t already). In mitigation, the mobile versions of the browser are pretty good, and if you do use Edge on the PC or Mac, it makes sense to sync stuff across to your phone as well.

The password autofill is pretty much indistinguishable when using Edge in place of Authenticator. The UX for password management, however, isn’t so good (go into mobile Edge, Settings, and look for Passwords) but maybe that’s the price of progress?

#74: ZoomIt joins the other ’toys

A large toybox with the Windows logo on the side, half-full of interesting looking toys. One of them

There’s a long history of people building cool add-ons and tools for Windows. From “Tiny Elvis” which amazed Win3.1 users, to a whole suite of tech-nerd extensions called Winternals, offering stuff that could peer under the hood of the then-new Windows NT system. Some were officially produced – the Microsoft Plus! pack for Win95, or numerous Resource Kit tools spring to mind.

Microsoft internal teams released a free set of utilities called PowerToys for Windows 95: some background to the developments came out 20 years ago.

A new PowerToys package appeared more recently for Windows 10 and 11 – it’s a free collection of numerous utilities which extend Windows in some way. Some have featured in previous ToWs – #647 and #15 among them (the former being Old Testament before the Great Reset, the latter being in the new world).

PowerToys is updated regularly on GitHub (see details on https://aka.ms/powertoysresleasenotes) and gets bug fixes for some of the tools, or periodically, whole new additions. After 5 years, it’s still “Preview” and has reached v0.90.1. Perhaps that version number is asymptotic, in that it will never actually be 1.0.

There are currently 25+ tools ranging from occasionally useful things like Find My Mouse to larger, previously separate utilities which might be used every day, like Mouse without Borders.

Look on the system tray for the colourful PowerToys icon and left-click on it to get the Quick access menu (currently non-customizable, which is a bit odd – like, how often do you need to edit your Hosts file? ).

Double-click on the PowerToys system tray icon and you’ll get a more expansive dialog, allowing you to enable or disable individual utilities and get a reminder of what the keystroke is to invoke it.

Don’t fall asleep

One of those occasionally handy tools that, when enabled, has its own system tray icon, is Awake.

It shows up as a coffee cup in the System tray and can be used to over-ride any compulsion your PC has to go to sleep or even blank the screen. Handy if you’re downloading something from a slow network and you need to keep the PC active, or you want to keep the machine available for remote access etc.

Another use case is when using PIP/split-screen modes on large monitors, things can get a bit unpredictable if the primary input disappears through power saving schemes. Setting a longer timeout for the “Keep awake” will mean the screen doesn’t blank so quickly, until you revert to normal and let the machine’s power plan take over.

Zoom Zoom!

A recent addition to PowerToys is ZoomIt (not to be confused with the metadirectory services company which was a forerunner to Microsoft Identity Manager).

If you’ve ever watched Azure CTO and all round technical fellow Mark Russinovich present at a major conference, you’ve almost certainly seen him using ZoomIt. In a nutshell, you can zoom into a static grab of the screen, using the mouse or trackpad to smoothly zoom in and out. It lets you annotate highlights using the mouse – Mark would do this to underline some part of a demo he was giving, showing where something has changed or where a command should be entered.

powertoys-zoomit

As well as zooming on a static view, it can also zoom into a live part of the screen too (which might be handy for doing precision mousing), plus some other neat presenter-friendly tricks like having a full-screen countdown timer.

ZoomIt was originally built by Mark’s company Winternals, which became SysInternals, and was acquired by Microsoft in 2006. The tool is available standalone from PowerToys if you prefer, alongside many other technical utilities.

#73: Seek and ye shall find. Maybe.

A person looking through a magnifying glass

AI-generated content may be incorrect.

When storage was less plentiful, computer users paid more attention to the location and size of their files. You’d delete stuff you didn’t need to free up space, and if you only had dozens or maybe a few hundred documents or emails, you’d probably remember how to find them.

Not so now. SSD drives for desktop PCs now cost under £50/Terabyte, or >5p per Gigabyte (compared to 30 years ago, when a 1GB drive could be ~£500, and 58 years ago a 1MB hard disk would have set you back $1M).

A Microsoft 365 Family subscription gives up to 6 people in the environment 1TB each of OneDrive storage as part of the £9/month total. Googlers can get 200GB of Drive space for £2.50 a month, or less than 1p per GB each month.

With storage so capacious and cheap, it’s easy to adopt the “piler” strategy that you don’t need to organise or file things away because you’ll be able to find them later, either through just remembering where you put them or by having some other kind of index or tool.

Time / Money

There used to be a website which posed the question that if Bill Gates (then the richest person in the world) was walking down the street and saw a $$ bill, would it need to be worth for him to stop and pick it up? Let’s ask Copilot to update that for today:

Now, if you estimate your own earnings and divide by 31,536,000, it’s probably going to be worthwhile stopping for a $1 note or £1 coin. But if you think about all the time it might take to manage your emails and old documents, vs just leaving them in place and paying for a bit more storage…

Finding documents on PC

Assuming you have documents and other files on your PC, perhaps synced down from a folder that lives in OneDrive, Google Drive, Dropbox etc, they should be indexed and easy to find. Maybe you’ve deliberately decided to keep files in a local folder that will be lost if your disk dies. Unless specifically excluded, Windows will index the contents of all your files, and lets you search from the Start menu or from within Windows Explorer.

Press the Windows key or icon to open Start and type in whatever you’re looking for. Helpfully, it offers files/documents or the option of searching the web for the same thing. Unhelpfully, some would opine, the web search uses Edge browser and the Bing search engine regardless of what the default browser/search engine is. This can be worked around but it’s a clumsy way to try to drive people to use Edge and Bing.

A screenshot of a computer

AI-generated content may be incorrect.

The Windows Search service (and Indexing Service that it replaced) runs in the background and been around in one form or another since Windows 2000. It spots when a file has changed and looks at its properties and contents, so it can be quickly located. Look at the ellipsis “…” on the search results on Start menu for a quick way to tweak the settings.

Some of the clickbaity “Do These 5 Things Right Now To Make Windows Faster!” type articles online would advocate for switching it off altogether, but the gains will be marginal. You’d be better following some of the other nonsense you’d find on the MSN/Bing/Edge homepage.

A screenshot of a screenshot of a screenshot of a screenshot of a screenshot of a screenshot of a screenshot of a screenshot of a screenshot of a screenshot

AI-generated content may be incorrect.

Former Windows engineer Dave Plummer shares his thoughts on the efficacy of Windows Search; it’s a relatively hard problem to solve without wasting a lot of resource, even if Macs do a better job (sometimes). If you know the content is on OneDrive / SharePoint / Dropbox etc, it might be quicker just going to the appropriate host and looking for the document there.

If you know the name of the file – or some part thereof – but you can’t recall where it is, then it’s worth looking at freeware, Everything. A super-slimmed down and lightning-fast interface will index filenames across the entire machine; if can also search contents if you like, but since they won’t be indexed first, it’s laboriously slow.

A screenshot of a computer

AI-generated content may be incorrect.

Hoping to find online

Locating documents online should be easy – for consumer OneDrive, just go to https://onedrive.live.com/ or for corporate files in SharePoint or OneDrive for business, try the new https://m365.cloud.microsoft/ homepage for Office 365 / Microsoft 365 Copilot.

OneDrive offers some useful benefits when managing photos – like the ability to show you pictures taken in a particular place or of specific things, just as Google Photos does. Finding stuff you’re pretty sure is there somewhere might not always work out, though – OneDrive has had a bug for some months which gives rather less than inclusive search results.

Here’s what comes back when the same query is run on the same set of 1,000s of photos stored in both OneDrive and Google… (using the Split view discussed in ToW #51):

A screenshot of a computer

AI-generated content may be incorrect.

Maybe relying on search to find stuff is a fool’s errand, and the Earth shall belong to the Filers after all.

#72: Sending pages from your pocket

Browsing on mobile devices is the main way people use the web. As mentioned in ToW #62, the last decade has seen a complete shift from PC & Mac being used for nearly 70% of web traffic to the dominant platforms being Android and iOS.

One nuance the stats don’t take into account, though, is that most of the 30% who’re still on Windows & OS X will also be browsing on whatever phone they have. It’s not uncommon to see people sitting in front of a desktop or laptop, while using their phone for other things – be that reading stuff in a mobile web browser or using a dedicated app.

Sharing is Caring

One feature common to all the main mobile browsers and their desktop equivalents is the ability to send pages (or tabs) from one to the other, assuming you’re signed in on both using the same account. While the meedja appears to work on the assumption that everyone+dog has an iPhone, around 2/3 of mobile browsing is done with Google Chrome and variants, and over 70% of the browsing devices are running Android.

For those reasons, we’re going to use Android and Windows as the use case for this week’s tip, but the same things can also be done on Mac + iOS. Probably.

Mobile apps -> desktop

If you’re sitting on the sofa flicking through stuff, there will be times where it’s easier to look at the content on a bigger screen. Sure, you might be able mirror the device on the big TV, but who ever does that?

Let’s say you’re browsing an eBay listing and want to send it to your laptop so you can see the pictures better. One option is to try using Google’s Quick Share to send something straight from a phone app to the PC, once you’ve set up the software and signed in.  Mac users need to jump through some additional non-official hoops.

Quick Share is the new name for “Nearby Share” –  start by clicking the sharing icon on the top of the eBay app (or from whatever app you’re looking to share something).

Article content

How the app behaves will differ from one to another; in the case of the eBay app, it will offer to send a link to this listing to some other app on the device, including the ability to share it elsewhere.

Article content

The list of apps (and contacts) will vary depending on usage. If you have Microsoft’s Phone Link already set up between your phone and PC, you can just fire it to your PC using the Send to PC command, and it will open a new browser page right away. If using Quick Share, you’ll get a prompt to open it.

Mobile browser -> desktop

Another more general and consistent use case is when you’re on the phone using a web browser rather than an app. Clicking the Share icon in Chrome will let you copy the link to the phone’s clipboard or send it to a variety of other contacts or apps (just as in the previous eBay app example), or “Send to devices”: in this case, any other device where you’re also logged in to Chrome with the same Google ID. You could also screen grab the page or generate a QR code, so if you want to share the link with someone nearby, you can do that more easily than faffing about with Bluetooth.

Article content

After tapping this option and choosing the relevant PC, you’ll see a notification show up in Chrome.

Article content

You’ll also see “Your devices” if you expand Chrome’s History either in the menu or by pressing CTRL+H…

Article content

From Edge to Edge

Some small proportion of Microsoft fans might be running the mobile Edge browser on their Android or even iOS phones. It’s a surprisingly good mobile browsing experience with built-in ad blocker, password saving integration with Microsoft Authenticator and an inevitable smatter of Copilotry.

Edge Mobile was built on the Chromium browser engine and released a year before the main desktop Edge was ported to Chromium too. As a result, many features in Google Chrome are also carried over (since it, unsurprisingly, is also based on Chromium), except that you’d be running Edge on your mobile device and signing into Edge on your PC or Mac using a Microsoft Account.

Similar to how Chrome does it, Edge will also let you send links to your PC or Mac – the quickest way is to go to the “hamburger” 3-line menu in the bottom right, and choose “Send to devices” to get a list of potential target computers. The menu that appears on the mobile browser may be several pages wide; swipe left and right to see the others and press and hold anywhere on the menu to edit it, allowing you to reorder the icons or hide/show them.

Article content

Just as Chrome behaves, having sent the link to one or multiple PCs, a notification will appear in desktop Edge inviting you to open it…

Article content

… and if you have the browser on PC and phone both set up to sync with your Microsoft Account, you’ll also see previous pages browsed on the phone by looking in the History page (CTRL+H) in Edge on the PC, which makes it easy to go back to pages you had previously viewed on the phone without needing to deliberately send them across.

Article content

#71: Trying to search on LinkedIn

a cartoon image of a man sitting in front of a desktop computer screen, showing him trying to search

Since you’re not reading this on LinkedIn, you’re maybe not one of the believersStay strong! It’s been nearly 9 years since Microsoft announced its plan to blow $26Bn on acquiring the social network for business users, supposedly in competition with Salesforce, Facebook, Google…

At the time, Forbes commented:

This new deal means Microsoft can embed LinkedIn with Skype, its email system and other enterprise products so that, in the words of one Silicon Valley expert, it will be able ‘to recreate the connective tissue for enterprises.’

It seems the Skype integration never really did pan out. Outlook and LinkedIn never got especially close, and Salesforce’s nightmare of Microsoft poring over all that data and not letting anyone else get access to it never really materialised. Even Microsoft tools don’t really have very good access to the data.

One of us (but not really)

At the time, the LinkedIn acquisition was Microsoft’s largest and seen as quite risky, with the backdrop of a failed $45B bid for Yahoo! and not-exactly-successful integrations of multi-billion buyouts of Nokia and others.

There was some consternation on how LinkedIn could possibly be worth all that money – one of the most popular internal Microsoft Yammer communities has even been reborn in LinkedIn, for current and former ‘softies alike …

Article content

(though Groups in LI seem to be less functional than Facebook Groups, so the place to go is FB’s Microsoft Old-timers, which has about 30x as many members).

In truth, LinkedIn has been very successfulas pointed out by the excellent Jack Rowbotham:

Article content

It’s said there are over 1 billion users. LinkedIn revenue was reported as growing 9% year-on-year in the FY25 Q2 results. Though revenue numbers are combined with other groups, Statista reckons that totals about $16B annual revenue. Not bad.

Maybe what has been LinkedIn’s biggest reason for success in the Microsoft family is that it’s never really been fully assimilated. Sure, management sits at the top table (and co-founder Reid Hoffman is on the board) but LinkedIn has been kept (or kept itself?) at arm’s length; Microsoft friends and partners are not LinkedIn friends and partners. LinkedIn employees have linkedin.com primary email addresses, not microsoft.com ones (even if they may also have a lesser-user microsoft.com address…) There’s a certain defiance of separateness even after almost a decade, a bit like Dynamics used to be or as GitHub also is.

Even the platform it runs on is not quite fully on the bus – after announcing a plan to gradually move to Azure and run on Azure Linux instead of CentOS, that has reportedly been binned in favour of a hybrid model.

Searching for stuff

To paraphrase Yoda: Search not: Find, though that is sometimes easier said than done. Along with holding itself apart organisationally and technically from the rest of Microsoft, LinkedIn has a somewhat stubbornly different look and feel to everything else that comes from Redmond.

Searching on LinkedIn starts with entering whatever you’re looking for in the search bar on the home page.

Article content

There are few operators you can use – AND/OR and putting stuff in quotes can help to guide things, but you will need to use the Posts / Companies etc filters to zone in to the right content, and you can only do that after the first search has been run. Note that AND, OR and NOT must be in capitals and they specifically call out that + / – isn’t supported.

So, if you want to find something – a previous post in a newsletter you’d read, for example – there isn’t an easy way to do it without first searching everything, then telling LinkedIn that you don’t want “people” but something else. Even going to the newsletter home page doesn’t give you the ability to search its contents, which seems like an own goal.

If you’re looking for a Post you may get a button offering “From my network”, and clicking on that will invoke a filter to select your top  connections, people you follow or your own posts.

Article content

But you might not get that option. If you don’t, then you need to select Posts and then use the Date, Content type or, in this example, “From Member” filter. If you’re looking for your own content, you need to type your own name and have it resolve, before clicking on show results.

Article content

More help is available on Search on LinkedIn, and you might notice that some filters stick sometimes (but not always) so if you’ve already set the Posts and From:me filters up, then others searches will keep them until you clear the filters, or they somehow just clear themselves.

Article content

When you do get results, depending on what you search for, you’ll be presented a list of things that look like they match, but there’s no highlighting of the search terms to see where that match is, so you’ll need to open them up individually to see if they match.

For the more adventurous, you could hack the URL to add search terms and set the filters – eg

https://www.linkedin.com/search/results/content/?keywords=vermouth%20AND%20recipe&postedBy=%5B%22me%22%5D

There are some special characters in that URL – %20 is space, %22 is “ and %5B and %5D are square brackets, so you could actually enter

https://www.linkedin.com/search/results/content/?keywords=vermouth AND recipe&postedBy=[“me”]

… and the browser will sort it out.

Or just search, get a wide range of initial results then use the filters. It’s less “correct” but it’s bound to be quicker.

#70: Two Score and Ten years

50 years ago to this very day, a small company called Micro-Soft was formed. Over the last half-century it has grown unbelievably, touched many lives and at varying times has had legions of fans and detractors alike.

There has been a lot of coverage on Microsoft’s own social channels and on their special website, Cheers to 50 years – Microsoft Unlocked, which covers a lot of ground and tells some interesting tales. Other takes include last year’s Wired special, slightly less curated by corp PR, Microsoft at 50: An AI Giant. A Kinder Culture. And Still Hellbent on Domination.

Stories often help to define a corporate culture but also to explain it to outsiders too. Sometimes, they feature as a backdrop to something else entirely. Let’s look at one in particular, the rocket that took Microsoft into orbit: the original PC.

Project Chess came to town

Much has been written about IBM deciding it wanted a piece of the burgeoning early 1980s home/small office computer market, as defined by popular machines like the Trash 80 or the Apple II. Big Blue was worried that it might miss the bandwagon and at the same time was concerned that corporate customers could put a highly spec-ed Apple II on their desk and run financial analysis from there, instead of relying on the IBM Big Iron in the Data Processing dept. Finance Directors and accountants could get instant answers for a few $K with VisiCalc on their Apple II, instead of waiting for the wonks in DP to turn reports around in 24hrs.

An Apple II with 48K of RAM had a list price of over $2.5K (something like $12K in today’s money), but the cheapest IBM computer at the time was more than five times as much. When IBM brass gave the go-ahead for what was to be “Project Chess” – to build an IBM personal computer – one stipulation was that it had to be ready in 12 months, with a prototype to be produced in only 1 month, with a target cost of $1,500.

This compressed timeline, and the need to keep costs low, meant usual IBM practices of building everything in-house had to go. As much componentry as possible was sourced off-the-shelf – controllers, disk drives, etc – and when it came to choosing software, they beat a path to Bill Gates’ door for Microsoft BASIC. At the time, every computer needed a programming language, and that’s what Microsoft did – developer tools for hobbyists, essentially.

So the Suits came to Redmond, and licensed Basic (and other languages). They happened to also ask if Bill & co could point them in the direction of a suitable operating system. The popular CP/M was identified as a possible – in fact, Microsoft made a bit of hardware called SoftCard that could run CP/M on Apple II machines, so compatible apps were also available to Apple users. CP/M was produced by a company called Digital Research, which was rumoured might have merged with Microsoft at one point (and was later acquired by Novell).

That NDA

When IBM’s reps went the following day to visit Digital Research in California, the boss – Gary Kildall – was not around (there are various stories as to why, but they’re not important right now). IBM’s team slapped their standard and very one-sided Non-Disclosure Agreement on the table, but DR’s lawyer and COO wouldn’t sign it; it could be summarised as, “Don’t tell us anything confidential; if you do tell us anything and we act on it, you can’t sue us. If we tell you anything confidential and you act on any of it, we’ll sue you”.

After a protracted impasse with DR, IBM went back to Microsoft and asked Bill to sort out the operating system problem; Bill & Paul Allen had already worked with a guy from another small company in Seattle, to do the prototype of the CP/M SoftCard and as luck would have it, partly because Digital Research was dragging its feet on 16-bit CP/M, he had built a 16-bit OS for Intel chips. Microsoft bought it, hired its author, and then built PC-DOS and later MS-DOS for the IBM PC, which went on to be wildly successful.

For more detail on the IBM side of things, see this good summary from PCMag – Project Chess: The Story Behind the Original IBM PC.

IBM’s missteps opened the door

IBM’s management believed that their economy of scale meant that even if other companies tried to build a “PC”, they could never do it cheaply enough to be a threat. Over the next few years, other pioneers managed to consolidate the number of chips and other parts required, but IBM’s proprietary BIOS chip, whose software controlled how the hardware worked together, was the key to true compatibility. Even if you built an exact copy of the PC hardware, it wouldn’t run DOS or any of the other applications with 100% success, unless the BIOS looked and behaved the same as IBM’s.

A company called Phoenix first reverse-engineered the IBM BIOS and started selling their “compatible” version, allowing for companies like Compaq and Dell to spring up, building 100% compatible machines which were cheaper than Big Blue’s, and in time got the jump by adopting newer and faster hardware (like 386 processors) before IBM did. The genie was now well out of the bottle, and despite their attempts to re-assert control with the PS/2 system and OS/2 software, IBM’s grip on the massively growing ecosystem had slipped. 20 years ago, they bailed out of the PC business they had invented, selling up to Lenovo.

The best deal in corporate history…

When IBM agreed to buy the operating system for that first Personal Computer 5150 – “PC Disk Operating System”, aka PC-DOS, the initial offer was to pay Microsoft to develop it but to give IBM all the rights. Bill pushed back and said Microsoft wanted to have the rights to sell a version – MS-DOS – to other companies too.

IBM was in such a hurry to do the deal – and thinking that nobody could build a cheaper, compatible machine anyway – agreed to let Microsoft have rights on MS-DOS.

Without this decision, it’s almost certain that the PC industry would not exist. There would be no Windows; maybe OS/2 would have been the GUI on the high-end, only-available-from-IBM PC (such as the strategy was behind the PS/2). Apple might have dominated with the completely proprietary Macintosh, and would that have evolved as much without the competition from hundreds of PC vendors? Would something else have come along instead?

The availability of a Phoenix BIOS and MS-DOS meant anyone could build a compatible and competitive machine. By the mid-1990s, over 200M PCs had been sold, though IBM had only around 8% of that market (Compaq overtaking it to be the largest single PC vendor in 1994).

Thanks to that one business decision made by IBM, Bill Gates & co, a multi-trillion dollar industry grew up.

Microsoft revenues from 1984 – 1999


Further Reading & Listening

If you’re interested in these snippets from the history books, there are many other sources of information.

Microsoft Volume I: The Complete History and Strategy – a 4-hour magnum opus podcast covering many points in the story of Microsoft. They talks about Project Chess and some of the points made above (from about 1h20m into the podcast).


Hard Drive: Bill Gates and the Making of the Microsoft Empire by James Wallace

One of the earliest chronicles of Bill Gates’ story and how Microsoft came into being, published in 1992 – so 17 years after the company came from nothing, and a little more than a decade after IBM launched the first PC. Lots happened since then, but this is a compelling account.


Arguably the best telling of the history behind lots of the early personal computer industry comes from ex-InfoWorld columnist, Bob Cringely. Accidental Empires (from 1992 before revisions) is entertaining and compelling – a must-read for anyone interested in this period. The chapter, “Chairman Bill Leads the Workers in Song” talks about what made BillG tick. The section on Steve Jobs, “The Prophet” (itself prophetic, as the book was written before Jobs came back to Apple and saved it from certain death), starts, “The most dangerous man in Silicon Valley sits alone on many weekday mornings, drinking coffee at II Fornaio, an Italian restaurant on Cowper Street in Palo Alto”

Cringely (or, rather, his real persona, Mark Stephens) produced a video series, “The Triumph of the Nerds(also pre-Jobs-as-Lazarus) which is basically a summary of the book, and is well worth watching – episode 2 covers the PC history; ep1 deals with the origin story of MITS and Apple, while ep3 covers the Apple Mac and Windows rivalry.

It’s absolutely brilliant. If you only read one book on the backstory of Silicon Valley and the PC industry which grew out of it, make it this one.


Showstopper! was an exceptional under-the-covers story of how Microsoft went from relying on a pretty flaky Windows-built-on-DOS offering, to building out a “proper” operating system which initially went into serious and professional environments. Guided by legendary ex-DEC operating system guru, Dave Cutler, Windows NT was fundamental to Microsoft’s push into the enterprise, finished off Novell on the server estate, went toe-to-toe with Unix in Workstations, and subsequently underpinned Windows XP and every Windows version since.


The first chapter of Microserfs started as a series of articles in Wired, before being published in a book in 1995. It charts a story about a software startup which grew from Microsoft; that first chapter starts by talking about Bill like some kind of mythological figure. The book name-checks lots of mid-90s references in the Redmond area, building numbers, local food outlets and so on. Anyone who was familiar with that region at that time must read this book.

The main character is Dan Underwood, and a few pages into the book he says “I am danielu@microsoft.com”. Years later, there really was a danielu and he used to get several emails a month saying things like “I read your book…”

He’s not there any more so don’t bother (or maybe he got MSIT to change his alias).

You had me at EHLO


Others worth a look

Barbarians Led by Bill Gates by Jennifer Edstrom – from 1998, just as the anti-trust heavies  were getting involved. This is a warts-and-all hatchet job from people who were inside at the time, or connected closely to the top brass.

Overdrive: Bill Gates and the Race to Control Cyberspace by James Wallace – A follow up to “Hard Drive”, dealing with Microsoft in the Netscape era.

Other recommendations from ex-Microsoftie David Gristwood


Oh, and for the real origin story, check out Celebrating 50 years of Microsoft from Bill Gates himself, charting how he and Paul Allen were inspired to found the company to write BASIC for that original 1975 computer, the MITS Altair 8800. The Personal Computer industry began 50 years ago, and marked a profound change from being mostly dependent on hardware innovation – as previous computers did – to one being all about the value and magic of software.

Happy Anniversary, Microsoft! Many of us were lucky to fall into the ecosystem you created, and have built happy and successful careers working with brilliant people ever since.

#69: Thinking Deeply

Designer (24)

It’s a little over 47 years since the Hitchhikers Guide To The Galaxy was first broadcast on the radio, followed by the publication of the written work the following year. It took the most powerful supercomputer, “Deep Thought”, 7.5 million years to come up with the Answer to the Ultimate Question.

deepthought

Who knows in the modern era how long it would take? Things have changed a lot over the last 50 years, and surely Google et al could manage a reply quicker than that.

It seems that the answers to many important but previously impossible questions are only a moment’s search away.

A screenshot of a web page

AI-generated content may be incorrect.

Copilot’s Getting Deeper

Microsoft quietly unveiled an additional feature to its main Copilot offering – i.e. the free, web thing or Copilot app on PC or mobile (as opposed to the paid-for Microsoft 365 offering, or any other app’s Copilot-branded functionality).

Go to copilot.ai and just below the prompt, select the drop-down to change the mode – with a single click on the flower-like icon (which is not at all like the OpenAI logo), you can get it to Think Deeper.

Screenshot 2025-03-28 081649

Screenshot 2025-03-28 081837

This feature uses the fairly recent o3-mini (high) model from OpenAI (which runs on Azure, don’t you know… well at least most of it does), giving additional insight into whatever you’re asking. It doesn’t take much longer to answer compared to the regular reply so you might just think about using it all the time for questions of moderate complexity. And it’s free.

ChatGPT itself has a “Deep Research” function which is available to paying users (Plus or Pro), and Microsoft has also unveiled a forthcoming “Researcher” capability that will be part of the Microsoft 365 Copilot commercial offering, alongside some deep reasoning stuff for agents built in Copilot Studio. It’s all getting really deep, man.

Wannabe Record Breakers

As well as Copiloting-everything (mostly based on top of OpenAI stuff), Microsoft has been looking further afield and building its own AI technologies. There’s still plenty of Ayy Eye noise coming from Redmond, and an AI Skills Fest virtual event starting in April is going to keep the foot on the gas.

It might have one of the more obscure Guinness World Records, too…

A group of people looking at a glass board

AI-generated content may be incorrect.

Let’s not get too excited now, kiddies. There are plenty of strange records to aspire to.

#68: It’s all about the prompt

A cartoon of a person talking to another person

AI-generated content may be incorrect.

When internet search engines took off in the mid 90s – remember Alta Vista? – and Google exploded into the public consciousness in the early 2000s, it became increasingly apparent that getting good search results were helped by being able to ask your question correctly.

Savvy searchers might use a combination of quotes and other “operators” to specify an exact phrase, or guide the search engine to include only certain terms or results from a particular website (such as site:tipoweek.com onenote). Google and Bing both tend to use the same operators (so, as Scott Hanselman would say, you could “Google with Bing”).

Prompting Today

A screenshot of a computer screen

AI-generated content may be incorrect.

When using some of the many AI tools such as ChatGPT, Copilot, Gemini etc, you can get very relevant results by being quite specific in what you ask it to do. As an example, one of the best ToW banner images was created using Microsoft Designer with the prompt, “a serene image of a young boy sitting at an old laptop (with Windows 10) but lurking in the dark background is the grim reaper”

A child sitting in a chair with a computer

AI-generated content may be incorrect.

Or, getting much more detailed, see Kat Beedim’s detailed 200+ word instructions to create consistently-formatted notes from meeting transcripts.

Being much more verbose and directional than you’d ever try in a regular search engine can give some quite remarkable results. The order of what you ask might vary the emphasis given to certain parts of the response, and the general advice is to be positive – i.e. ask for things you want, rather than telling it what you don’t want.

A polar bear and cub in the snow

AI-generated content may be incorrect.

It seems that AI can suffer from a variant of Dostoevsky’s “White Bear Problem”; ie. Asking it not to do something increases the likelihood of doing it. Not long after Microsoft went big on Copilot and Designer, here’s one example when Copilot was asked to draw an image on a particular topic…

No photo description available.

The idea was to convey a background threat with those hooded figures, not the feeling that the poor girl was in imminent peril. The figures lurking in the background might be a mite less sinister if they weren’t armed, so clarification was called for…

No photo description available.

Maybe DALL-E 3 at that time was just fixated with firearms, or asking it not to do something was a step too far. We’ve gone from “some guns” to “pointing guns at her”. Hmmm.

No photo description available.

Trying the same prompt in Designer seemingly gets a little less gun-heavy now, but still has the odd one creeping in. Trying to be more explicit doesn’t appear to work… adding to the end of the prompt, “The sinister hooded figures are not carrying guns of any kind”.

You might think that instruction is simple enough, but no. It seems to be interpreted as “you want more guns? Gotcha”.

A person sitting at a desk with a computer

AI-generated content may be incorrect.

Further reading

See here for some more tips on Copilot, or take a look at some pearls from the Copilot support team. Also, look out for some more in-depth instructions on using ChatGPT.

For business Copilot with M365 users, the Copilot Prompt Gallery is worth a play.

A screenshot of a computer

AI-generated content may be incorrect.

For other Copilot ideas, check out Chris Stuart Ridout talking about Prompt Buddy, a Teams app which lets users share good prompts with others in the company.

A screenshot of a computer

AI-generated content may be incorrect.

#67: Are you sitting comfortably?

Regular readers of ToW might have spotted the caption under the main image of last week’s missive: it was a photo of Steve Jobs and Bill Gates, for a 1991 article in Fortune magazine written to celebrate the 10th anniversary of the PC. Taken at Jobs’ house, the image shows supposed soap-dodger Steve barefoot astride a lounge chair, with Bill perched on its footstool, or “ottoman”.

There are no official online archives of this article (at least, not easily found) however physical copies pop up at auction on occasion and there is at least one downloadable scanned copy.

fortune

The chair / stool in question is an iconic shape, known as the Eames Lounge Chair and designed in 1956 by couple Charles and Ray Eames for the Herman Miller furniture company. You may remember Herman Miller from the ubiquitous and not-inexpensive Aeron office chair.

Buying a genuine Herman Miller Eames chair in the US will cost a pretty penny (even old ones running to thousands), though licensed versions were made in Europe and Asia. Vitra still sells their version now, though be sure to be sitting down before you look at the price.

If you’re keen to add a bit of mid-century chic to your home without further ruining your financial future, knock-off versions are available on eBay. Or, especially if based in the UK, look at Iconic Interiors, who produce a high-quality replica at a fraction of the price of the official one.

So that’s the comfy seating for putting the world to rights taken care of; what about the day-to-day seating for getting the work done?

The Desk-jockey

Designer (21)

Deskbound office workers are reckoned to spend between anything up to 9 hours a day slouched at their desk, leading to more than 2 months a year of being officially “sedentary”. Businesses insisting on staff returning to the office for much or all of the working week could trumpet the benefits on their physical and mental wellbeing compared to the WFHers, though perhaps they should make sure they have an environment that can accommodate everyone.

Having a sit/stand desk is one way of avoiding the doldrums as long as you remember to actually use it standing up occasionally. If you’re a hybrid/home worker, FlexiSpot do a decent range that’s not shockingly expensive, in case you’re looking for recommendation; also available in the UK. Why limit yourself to merely sitting or standing, when you could do so much more at your desk?

Should your employer decide that you need to be in the office all the time, they do have some responsibility in making sure the workspace isn’t going to cause harm. The UK’s Elfin Safety executive even has published requirements, which could be handy if you’re trying to persuade your employer that sitting at a cafeteria table all day isn’t good enough.

How to sit at your desk

Sit up straight. Shoulders back, don’t slouch. Feel on the floor and don’t cross your legs. Keep your elbows at 90 degrees. Raise the height of your chair. That screen needs to be higher. You might have seen these pieces of advice before, but not all are necessarily correct, and you can certainly find plenty of supporters for and against.

One view is that you need to keep your feet behind your hips. This could stop your back from curving as you sit at the desk. Others would say, don’t sit straight, instead recline your chair. It’s quite probable that your seat is too low – many office chairs just don’t even adjust high enough, or may have large armrests that stop you sitting close enough to the desk.

The UK’s HSE recommended posture follows fairly conventional groups – sit straight, have your chair at a height where your elbows are level with your hands, and have the top of your monitor at eye level.

laptopy

If you have a laptop, ideally use an external keyboard and put your PC on books or a dedicated stand to raise it up so the screen is high enough to not make you stoop or bend your neck down. Working in the typical laptop hunch is bearable on a train or plane, maybe OK sitting at a temporary desk for an hour, but should definitely not be the norm for whole days at a stretch.

There are extremes you could go to in trying to perfect ergonomics, but if all you do is sit with elbows level to your keyboard and eyeballs level with the screen, you’ll be going in the right direction.

#66: A computer on every desk?

0603722711647-web-tete

A computer on every desk, and in every home, running Microsoft software” – was an early and, at the time, unbelievably ambitious goal for a small company from Albuquerque which later moved up to Bellevue, WA.

Things have moved on radically since Microsoft was founded nearly 50 years ago; now, everyone who needs a computer on a desk has one, and billions more have one on their lap or in their hand. SteveB talked recently, in a retrospective “Alumni Voices” interview, about the early days.

Thinking about PC usage (for Windows and Macs); laptops overtook desktops some years ago (notebooks outselling desktops 4:1). Laptop manufacturers evolve them more quickly, with better screens, longer battery life and now, ramming in AI features, often refreshing their ranges regularly.

But if you sit at a desk most of the time, and all your data is in the cloud anyway, shouldn’t your primary computer be a desktop? Maybe you could have a medium-spec laptop for when you need to be mobile, and a comparatively high-end desktop for the rest of the time?

If you’re using a laptop for work and spend much of your work/life in one place, at least make sure you get a proper monitor.

I found this image at the top when searching, “is it OK to sit on the ottoman of an Eames chair?” – the answer was captioned, “it is, if you’re Bill Gates”

Article content

Moore’s law

The oft-mis-quoted effect (that stuff gets faster/cheaper/bigger all the time) of Moore’s law could be applied to the growth in laptop usage;  there’s more to be gained from miniaturization when you’re carrying a machine around, as well as advances in battery and display technology.

Desktops have tended to be left behind; there’s no built-in screen (unless they’re an all-in-1), they don’t run on batteries and they often sit out of sight, with the user interacting through a separate mouse, keyboard and looking at a desktop monitor. Old PCs were boring to look at, sometimes quite noisy and clearly fixed in position.

Now, many new home desktops are sold as gaming PCs with high end graphics and are often adorned with elaborate cooling, colourful lights and the like.

Acer Predator Orion 5000 (2024) review

The rise of the Mini

Around 20 years ago, capable desktop PCs started to shrink in size – it wasn’t uncommon to see demos being run from a “Shuttle Box”, which had way more storage and CPU horsepower than could be gotten from a laptop of the time, so it was possible to run servers in VMs on Virtual PC or similar.

Mac Mini and other small-form devices followed, but were often relegated to secondary use.

Julian Datta and Brett Johnson, posing in 2007 with a Shuttle which worked so hard it was literally smokin

Desktops for today

If you’re running a laptop from a home office and sit at a desk 90% of your day, it’s worth looking at getting a modern, small form desktop. They’re quiet, can be much neater than a laptop with loads of cables or a docking station, and can be surprisingly cheap.

An Dell Inspiron with Intel i5 10-core CPU, 16GB RAM and 1TB SSD can cost £650 (eg Dell Inspiron Desktop with the Latest Intel Processors). If you’re using an existing screen setup from an older laptop, you might need to buy a webcam too. A broadly comparable laptop might cost £100 or more extra, though it might last a good bit less time than a well-spec’ed desktop.

Desktops are generally more self-upgradeable and repairable than laptops, though that tends to change when you get into highly miniaturized machines. Framework, who build laptops that are sold as being fixable rather than disposable, recently unveiled their first desktop too

Framework | Configure Framework Desktop DIY Edition (AMD Ryzen™ AI Max

Further reading

If you’re already (or still) using a desktop for everyday computing, feel free to comment for others to hear your thoughts. If you’re just desktop-curious, check out some recent reviews…

The ASUS NUC 15 Pro Is Built for Upgrades

I moved my workflow to a Windows 11 PC no bigger than a bagel | Windows Central

Chuwi UBox mini PC review | TechRadar